<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using A Wiki To Replace Requirements And Produce Documentation For Your Agile Projects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidwhitney.co.uk/content/blog/index.php/2009/04/07/using-a-wiki-to-replace-requirements-and-produce-documentation-for-your-agile-projects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidwhitney.co.uk/Blog/2009/04/07/using-a-wiki-to-replace-requirements-and-produce-documentation-for-your-agile-projects/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:18:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Englestone</title>
		<link>http://www.davidwhitney.co.uk/Blog/2009/04/07/using-a-wiki-to-replace-requirements-and-produce-documentation-for-your-agile-projects/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Englestone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidwhitney.co.uk/content/blog/?p=138#comment-90</guid>
		<description>I agree. You need requirements. I&#039;m amazed at the number of people that don&#039;t &#039;get it&#039; as you put it. Would you ask someone to build you a house without architect plans? as that&#039;s effectively what your&#039;re doing.

Well actually it&#039;s more like not stating how many windows your want, how many stories, what colour. Same diff you&#039;d end up with a crappy house that&#039;s not what you wanted.

You also need the right people coming up with the requirements for a project and that means &#039;buy-in&#039;. Without buy-in from main stakeholders requirements are flawed. I&#039;m shocked when the wrong people compile the requirements. Cringe.

Bad requirements = Bad solution.

-- Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. You need requirements. I&#8217;m amazed at the number of people that don&#8217;t &#8216;get it&#8217; as you put it. Would you ask someone to build you a house without architect plans? as that&#8217;s effectively what your&#8217;re doing.</p>
<p>Well actually it&#8217;s more like not stating how many windows your want, how many stories, what colour. Same diff you&#8217;d end up with a crappy house that&#8217;s not what you wanted.</p>
<p>You also need the right people coming up with the requirements for a project and that means &#8216;buy-in&#8217;. Without buy-in from main stakeholders requirements are flawed. I&#8217;m shocked when the wrong people compile the requirements. Cringe.</p>
<p>Bad requirements = Bad solution.</p>
<p>&#8211; Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

