<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Lies &amp; Real Solutions (Or Why SEO Experts Are All Hacks) &#8211;  A Case Study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidwhitney.co.uk/content/blog/index.php/2009/01/15/seo-lies-real-solutions-or-why-seo-experts-are-all-hacks-a-case-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidwhitney.co.uk/content/blog/index.php/2009/01/15/seo-lies-real-solutions-or-why-seo-experts-are-all-hacks-a-case-study/</link>
	<description>closure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:09:43 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: binomsc</title>
		<link>http://www.davidwhitney.co.uk/content/blog/index.php/2009/01/15/seo-lies-real-solutions-or-why-seo-experts-are-all-hacks-a-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>binomsc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidwhitney.co.uk/content/blog/index.php/2009/01/15/seo-lies-real-solutions-or-why-seo-experts-are-all-hacks-a-case-study/#comment-534</guid>
		<description>Hi,

nice article. Not very surprisingly in the result (&quot;Content is king&quot;), however interesting to do the maths (salary of SEO Manager vs. AdWord campaign).

Pls allow some remarks:
1) SEM is usually understood as Search Engine Marketing (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SEM) which would include SEO and AdWords (among others). At least in Germany SEM nowadays is a synonym for buying traffic via AdWords. However, it does not change your analysis much.
2) PPC is also the model behind AdWords - you pay (Google) per click they provide you. For me is &quot;SEM/PPC/AdWords/Analytics&quot; therefor like saying the same thing three times: Buy traffic at Google (and measure it through Analytics). Still, it does not change your analysis much.

BUT:

3) Your experience and article refers to a e-Commerce site. Have a look at a newssite for instance. There running a keyword campaign is much more work, it changes daily, sometimes even within minutes (e.g. breaking news). The SEO-guy should provide the editors with the right keywords, make the analysis the editors can not do because they have to write an article - and do it FAST. Additionally, the result (traffic/views) of each article should be measured - does this lead article perform as good as the benchmark? This can not be done with Google Analytics, you need a real-time webtracking tool. Additionally, as the monetization of such a website is mostly depending on (reach based) CPM-advertising, the calculation of the &quot;break-even&quot;-point of Adwords is not that easy like in e-Commerce.

Okay, to sum it up: I agree, that there are a lot of &quot;SEO experts&quot;, &quot;SEO Manager&quot; etc which are not worth the money they request. However, for content driven sites I believe there should be someone taking care for Keywords, AdWords, and SEO-results. If this person is worth 35.000 GBP/year... I don&#039;t know :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>nice article. Not very surprisingly in the result (&#8221;Content is king&#8221;), however interesting to do the maths (salary of SEO Manager vs. AdWord campaign).</p>
<p>Pls allow some remarks:<br />
1) SEM is usually understood as Search Engine Marketing (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SEM" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SEM</a>) which would include SEO and AdWords (among others). At least in Germany SEM nowadays is a synonym for buying traffic via AdWords. However, it does not change your analysis much.<br />
2) PPC is also the model behind AdWords &#8211; you pay (Google) per click they provide you. For me is &#8220;SEM/PPC/AdWords/Analytics&#8221; therefor like saying the same thing three times: Buy traffic at Google (and measure it through Analytics). Still, it does not change your analysis much.</p>
<p>BUT:</p>
<p>3) Your experience and article refers to a e-Commerce site. Have a look at a newssite for instance. There running a keyword campaign is much more work, it changes daily, sometimes even within minutes (e.g. breaking news). The SEO-guy should provide the editors with the right keywords, make the analysis the editors can not do because they have to write an article &#8211; and do it FAST. Additionally, the result (traffic/views) of each article should be measured &#8211; does this lead article perform as good as the benchmark? This can not be done with Google Analytics, you need a real-time webtracking tool. Additionally, as the monetization of such a website is mostly depending on (reach based) CPM-advertising, the calculation of the &#8220;break-even&#8221;-point of Adwords is not that easy like in e-Commerce.</p>
<p>Okay, to sum it up: I agree, that there are a lot of &#8220;SEO experts&#8221;, &#8220;SEO Manager&#8221; etc which are not worth the money they request. However, for content driven sites I believe there should be someone taking care for Keywords, AdWords, and SEO-results. If this person is worth 35.000 GBP/year&#8230; I don&#8217;t know :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
